Site Network: Home | Blogcrowds | Gecko and Fly | Free Online Libraries | Free Antivirus | Free CAD Software | Free Software | Telegraph TV | About

Advertisement

Your Ad Here

UTeM BMFR Google Search Engine

Custom Search

There are many ways to classify milling machines, depending on which criteria are the focus:

Criterion ↓ Example classification scheme ↓ Comments ↓
Control Manual;
Mechanically automated via cams;
Digitally automated via NC/CNC
In the CNC era, a very basic distinction is manual versus CNC.
Among manual machines, a worthwhile distinction is non-DRO-equipped versus DRO-equipped
Control (specifically among CNC machines) Number of axes (e.g., 3-axis, 4-axis, or more);
Within this scheme, also:
  • Pallet-changing versus non-pallet-changing
  • Full-auto tool-changing versus semi-auto or manual tool-changing
Spindle axis orientation Vertical versus horizontal;
Turret versus non-turret
Among vertical mills, "Bridgeport-style" is a whole class of mills inspired by the Bridgeport original
Purpose General-purpose versus special-purpose or single-purpose
Purpose Toolroom machine versus production machine Overlaps with above
Purpose "Plain" versus "universal" A distinction whose meaning evolved over decades as technology progressed, and overlaps with other purpose classifications above; more historical interest than current
Size Micro, mini, benchtop, standing on floor, large, very large, gigantic
Power source Line-shaft-drive versus individual electric motor drive Most line-shaft-drive machines, ubiquitous circa 1880-1930, have been scrapped by now
Hand-crank-power versus electric Hand-cranked not used in industry but suitable for hobbyist micromills

0 Comments:

Post a Comment



UTeM BMFR Blog Directories

UTeM BMFR MyBlogLog